🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. This production, however, may align too neatly with the carefully constructed version promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a compliment instead of a challenge.

The Manufactured Strongman

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and the country's pop-culture machine have worked together to craft a tailor-made version of the president. This character is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a TV series released last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from chaos. While the character's name a different name, the message is clear: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him not as a cause but as a symptom, moving the narrative weight to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to steady the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the background, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, none of this took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged Putin to take the job. The presidency was in essence a casting call with no shortage of contenders. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the country de facto.

• The shortlist featured various figures, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who researched Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A property developer close to the events stated the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden fall apart under examination. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. The grittier interpretation prompted local outlets and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures in the story, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. He is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. In this new film, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it might seek to question.