🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your night?

It was necessary since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes added later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year backed Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over half. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. So there existed some opposition. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.